Recent Posts
26
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 8. Global South, Global North 1
**6 min read**
Now that the concept of "developing" and "developed" countries is at last unfashionable,
5 min read
23
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 7. Let these ideas die!
The many discussions I have recently had about the effort that is now in place to get to DAC evaluation
5 min read
19
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 6. Key issues before deciding
This final post about the DAC criteria captures key points for consideration in the evaluation for development space. It is
6 min read
16
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 5. Non-negotiable criteria
It is ironic that evaluation has been unable to prevent - or even just sufficiently critique - some of the
9 min read
12
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 4. Flexible criteria
Our development evaluation criteria should not be determined solely by stakeholder-determined interests, or by pragmatism resulting from constrained resources. Development
4 min read
09
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 3. What should determine them?
It will be unwise only to 'fix' in an ad hoc manner the weaknesses in the composition and
2 min read
06
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 2. Why change?
Given the good contributions of the DAC criteria noted in Part 1 of this series, let us now turn to
7 min read
02
Oct
The DAC criteria, Part 1. The positives
The highly influential DAC evaluation criteria need to be revised. Some say reformed. What will modernised evaluation criteria for development
3 min read
10
Mar
Sustaining (development) impact
These days we talk a lot about “sustainable development”. And about “evaluating impact”. But I continue to maintain that it is useless to evaluate the impacts of an intervention without focusing on whether such impacts have a good chance to sustain.
4 min read
21
Feb
No, I am NOT a “development evaluator”. I evaluate FOR development.
I do not do "development evaluation". I do not practice the evaluation OF development. I evaluate FOR development.
6 min read